Sunday, 11 November 2012

Films of the Month: November

Blue Lagoon was a controversial film, released in 1980, that starred a then 14 year old Brooke Shields as a shipwrecked castaway, who is forced to grow up and mature on a remote island with her cousin (Christopher Atkins). The film however wasn't as controversial as Shields' previous role as a child prostitute in 1978's Pretty Baby, made when she was just 11 years old.
 The film starts as the children are left on the island as pre-pubescent castaways, and follows them as they mature from the age of innocence, to an age of sexual awareness. They are initially guided to life on the island by fellow castaway Leo McKern, who soon after dies, after drowning whilst drunk. It is at this point that the children's loss of innocence begins, as they begin to deal with the darker side of life. Mirroring the children's evolution are images of natures on cycle of life, which they cohabit with on the island. However, these scenes come off as rather amateurish, simplistic and a bit too pretentious to really aid the film. The acting does manage to get away with any accusations of woodenness, due to the subject matter at hand, and both Atkins and Shields' manage to do an adequate job at portraying their naivety. McKern in fact manages to pull out a wonderful cameo at the start of the film, that matches his usual onscreen energy and persona.
 Apart from the occasional flashes of child nudity, there is nothing really explicit that suggests this film should have garnered the controversy it did. In fact it comes across as quite pure, but ultimately a bit too sweet for it to be considered an accomplished work. Unfortunately, it does struggle to compete with the similarly themed Death in Venice and Lolita, which are far superior in style and execution. It's biggest strength comes from the source material from which it is based: Henry De Vere Stacpoole's novel of the same name; which leads me to think that this is a film that may do better being remade.
                                                        

 No Way Out was an espionage thriller starring a youthful Kevin Costner, as a naval officer who gets involved with the defence secretary's (Gene Hackman) mistress (Sean Young). The defence secretary kills his mistress by accident, and Costner's character is the man brought in to divert suspicion away from the defence secretary.
 For such a convoluted plot, it is actually pulled off far more impressively than the synopsis suggests; although it may seem a little bit dated these days. There are moments of genuine tension and the film has one of the truly most bizarre endings in film history. The performances are also quite good, especially from Costner, who manages to carry the film well, though he is sometimes let down by Young's at times erratic demeanour.  His scenes opposite Hackman invoke some of Costner's best scenes, and Hackman manages his usual level of vigour. David Bowie's wife Iman and Will Patton also provide impressive support.
 For a film of it's ilk, that is probably quite forgotten in this day and age, it does actually have something about it that will probably still resonate with today's audience. Whilst not a great thriller, it is worth watching, if not for the already mentioned ending that will leave you dumbfounded.
                                             

 Silver Linings Playbook promised much, with many critics calling it one this year's best films. It told the story of a man (Bradley Cooper) recently released from a mental institution, who sets about trying to reconcile with his wife. Along the way though he meets a fellow troubled soul in the form of his friend's sister in law (Jennifer Lawrence), who promises to help him by being the go between with him and his wife. Along the way we encounter all the peripheral characters in this man's life, whose own idiosyncracies seem to point to Cooper's character not being the only one with mental health problems.
 The film is refreshingly original, and one can see why the critics have fallen for it. However it is a bit too gimmicky at times to really be counted as something genre defining. Whilst it is both amusing and fun, it does try to cater too much for it's target audience by reverting to cheap sentiment at times. In many ways it reminded me of last year's Crazy. Stupid. Love., but this was definitely a bit more grounded, although not as  enjoyable as the aforementioned. The acting was good in this too, with both Bradley Cooper and Jennifer Lawrence managing to provoke a lot of likeability in his complex character. It was the first film of Lawrence I had seen, and she gave a mature performance that it's surprising to learn she is only 22. The film also featured Robert De Niro as Cooper's father, whilst recently De Niro has paled in the performance that made him once a true great of cinema, here at least he gives a likeable turn, with traces of his past bravura. Chris Tucker also gave his first performance in 15 years that wasn't part of the money cow Rush Hour franchise. Tucker showed that he isn't just a one trick pony, and gave an endearing turn as Cooper's equally troubled ex-inmate.
 It's a film that will rise to the top of what has been a remarkably subdued year for films, especially from Hollywood. It is easy to see why it's garnering such praise, it's problem is though is that it is a little to unremarkable to be remembered beyond this year. Ultimately it's another film that leaves any film buff asking "Is this the best they can come up with?".

Bond at 50: Skyfall Review

 And so it came to pass, 50 years of Bond, and the 23rd official James Bond film of the franchise was released. I came in expecting a film that would compliment the franchise greatly, as well as being an improvement on the disappointing Quantum of Solace. This was exactly what I got.
 As with all Bond films, the prologue had to be action packed, and set the tone for the rest of the film. Skyfall certainly produced action as Bond (Daniel Craig) and his colleague (Naomi Harris) embarked on a chase through the streets of Istanbul. It was exhilarating and the jolt in the arm the film needed, in order to engage the audience immediately. The climax of the prologue, meandered into the opening title sequence beautifully. Whilst I didn't care much for Adele's theme song to the film, I was especially impressed by the opening title sequence of the film. It was poetic and somehow poignant and appropriate for the film we were about to watch. It certainly ranks up there with the best of the Bond title sequences.

 The film itself was dark, brooding and everything we've come to expect from Craig's "grittier" Bond, but there was still the heart and essence in the film that has made the franchise so popular. As this was an anniversary Bond, there was also of course some wonderful references to past Bond films particularly The Man With The Golden Gun. There was a particular scene that literally mirrored the scene from Scaramanga's fun house. Of course a lot of the references were wonderfully subtle, mixed with the blindingly obvious (such as the silver DB5, and Bond giving some confidential papers "For her Eyes Only").
 Technically the film was sound. Sam Mendes helmed the picture, and upon his announcement there were a few eyebrows raised. Mendes thankfully overcame any doubts over his ability to make an action film, by directing a very fundamentally Bond film, but as well as adding his own touches of emotional input that helped form the Bond universe, and indeed Bond himself (afterall the Craig films have thus far been set at the very beginning of the James Bond story). The acting talent on show is also the film's biggest strenght. With names such as Albert Finney, Ralph Fiennes, Rory Kinnear as well as the steadfast Judy Dench, the film was always going to be in safe hands. But added to that Berenice Marlohe and Naomi Harris, who were both well suited to their roles, especially Harris, who seemed in my opinion to be a perfect fit. Then there was Javier Bardem as main villain Silva, a former agent who felt betrayed by MI6 and is carrying out his vengeance. Whilst obviously not quite the powerhouse performance that earned him the Oscar in No Country For Old Men; Bardem gets the role right, with his usual show of bravura mixed in with his natural tempered charisma. It was also interesting to see that the character was bisexual (probably by Mendes hand), which made his scenes with Craig, even more riveting to watch.
                                                           

*SPOILERS WITHIN
 As for the story, it was a well written affair full of all the betrayal, violence and emotion that have made Bond so entertaining. With light touches of humour that have meant the films still have that element of fantasy, that makes them still enjoyable. The film was pretty much what I expected in terms of it's place in the franchise. I expected this film to be set immediately before Dr. No, and in terms of the cast I expected Ralph Fiennes to be the new M and Naomi Harris to become Moneypenny. It was also as the film panned out that I expected M (Dench) to die, but unfortunately, possibly due to classifying the film as a 12, the writers weren't brave enough to let Silva (Bardem) kill her, which I think would have been brave and a fitting end to the film. However it must be said, I would have been very disappointed if the film hadn't have panned out as I'd anticipated. It was wonderful the way the film ended in an evolution of the beginning of Dr. No. Though it was a bit too much watching the DB5 get massacred, but at least I know it'll be back in time for Goldfinger. I think the next Daniel Craig film will be set a lot further into the future, and Craig will hopefully portray a far more relaxed and wiser Bond.

 The film on whole was very enjoyable, and a noticeable improvement on Quantum of Solace, however it was still not as good as Casino Royale, which had the rawness and the audacity to reignite the franchise, in a way that was appropriate and didn't take liberties. I think Skyfall, will be a fondly remembered Bond, but it doesn't quite have that edge or indeed uniqueness that sets it apart from the others, and amongst the best.