Friday 21 October 2011

In Profile: Patrick McGoohan

 Probably one of the most enigmatic stars of the small screen. Patrick McGoohan was born in America in 1928, before being raised in both Ireland and England. It's easy to forget that this somewhat unconventional star, also wrote and created, some of both his and British TV's most enduring shows.

 His parents had travelled to New York in order to find work, but soon returned to Ireland after Patrick's birth. He spent his early childhood here, before moving to Sheffield, then due to the outbreak of WW2, he was evacuated to Loughborough, where he gained aptitude for both mathematics and boxing.
 He left school at 16, when he returned to Sheffield and worked as a bank clerk, lorry driver and chicken farm manager, whilst which he joined several dramatic societies. He soon managed to become the stage manager at Sheffield Reperatory Theatre. McGoohan acting career was launched when one night, after an actor had fallen ill, he decided to fill in. He soon became the regular leading man for the company, and met his wife Joan Drummond here, they married in 1951.
                                                              

 He soon moved down to London, where he secured a role at the Garrick Theatre in the play 'Serious Charge', during which he was offered his first film role in 'Passage Home'. He would earn further bit parts in 'I Am A Camera', 'Dark Avenger' and the classic war film 'The Dam Busters'. He eventually secured a 5 year contract with the Rank film studios, the biggest in Europe at the time. This gave him a steady income and a more permanent role in the film industry. He left the organisation a year early and appeared in more plays again, this time these plays were to be transmitted on to television. This provided McGoohan with a greater audience as TVs were becoming very popular in UK households at the time. His role in 'The Greatest Man in the World' earned him an award for best British TV actor.

                                                             
 It was around this period that legendary media mogul Lew Grade, who owned the TV production company ITC became interested in the actor. It was to see McGoohan cast as an Irish-American Agent working under NATO jurisdiction and performing assignments around the world. The character, John Drake, was designed as a non-violent spy who didn't get too romantically involved with female interests. The character would also be at odds with the ethically practises of his superiors and his missions.
 Due to the Anglo-American interests of the character and the agency, Grade had hoped to crack the American market as well as the European. Despite the series being an instant success across Europe, making McGoohan a household name. In America however, it failed to find an audience and wasn't able to secure further American finance, and so was cancelled after one series.

 After Danger Man had been cancelled in 1962, McGoohan spent some time making more low profile movies as well as made for TV plays. After a two year break Danger Man was brought back, after being resold around the world, and repeat viewings showing a greater demand for more shows, as well as this was the worldwide success of the James Bond films. The programme got financially backed again, and it was revamped.
                                           

 Instead of the original 25 minute format, episodes became twice as long. John Drake, also reverted to being a British spy, made less conflicting with his superiors and the show was renamed in America as 'Secret Agent'. Danger Man also utilised new modern, hi-tech spy equipment such as hidden microphones and tape recording electric razors. It was during this run that it started to garner a greater fan following and secure it's reputation as a cult classic. As such McGoohan salary rocketed to £2,000 per week, making him Britain's highest paid television actor.

 McGoohan however was glad to be released of his contract after it's two season run saying, "I would rather do twenty TV series than go through what I went through under that Rank contract I signed a few years ago for which I blame no one but myself." His strict religious standards (a Roman Catholic) also caused clashes with producers on set. He recalled: “When we started Danger Man the producer wanted me to carry a gun and to have an affair with a different girl each week. I refused. I am not against romance on television, but sex is the antithesis of romance. Television is a gargantuan master that all sorts of people watch at all sorts of time, and it has a moral obligation towards its audience.” It was also whilst on Danger Man, that he demanded more creative control over the program, asking to write, direct and even produce episodes as the show evolved.

 It was during this period that McGoohan was offered the role of Simon Templar in The Saint, and even more substantially he was personally offered, by Albert "Chubby" Broccoli, the role of James Bond. He turned them both down, not wanting to be typecast or having to conform to the "playboy" lifestyle of the James Bond character. Many actors would never have opportunities such as the Bond franchise again, but McGoohan, seemed to know what he was doing. Whilst doing Danger Man he fulfilled a 3 film contract with the Walt Disney company, which gave him further international exposure. Including The Scarecrow of Romney Marsh and culminating in The Three Lives of Thomasina.
                                        

 With his stock at an all time high, he now realised he was able to give himself greater creative control. This gave him an idea for a new character, loosely based on his previous incarnation of John Drake. He was to produce a new form of engimatic protaganist, in an environment that would later influence shows such as Twin Peaks, Lost and films such as The Truman Show. The role was not a name but a number, and the show was The Prisoner.

 The setting of Portmerion in Wales, was eerily appropriate, and the mediterranian infrastructure, served to act "The Village" as a character of it's own. Number 6 (Patrick McGoohan), would spend each 50 minute weekly episode, trying to escape "the Village" and it's inhabitants. With the Number 2, regularly being rotated after failing to procure the information as to why Number 6 resigned from his governmental post. It's countercultural, revolutionary and original themes seemed somewhat suited to the period (1967). Considering the profound nature of the show, McGoohan was extremely fortunate to be able to pitch it to then chairman Lew Grade, who gave him his full support, even allowing McGoohan to film the programme in colour. To this day, it remains unclear as to whether Number 6 is infact John Drake himself. In 1985 McGoohan himself dismissed this idea, though other writers on both shows insist they are one and the same. Fans are still divided, with some pointing to many similarities between the shows and certain episodes that make this idea logical.
 Originally McGoohan only wanted to make 7 episodes of The Prisoner, but Grade convinced him, that by doing more shows, they could sell it on to CBS in America. CBS wanted 36 episodes, Grade 26, but McGoohan was able to settle on 17. There is also speculation, that a higher number was originally agreed upon, but the series got cancelled, which forced the final 2 episodes to be written abruptly. The final episode still the cause for much debate amongst fans, and certainly one of the first TV finales to end in such ambiguous circumstances.
 During it's first runs, in both the UK and America, it wasn't received well by critics, though viewing figures in the UK remained solid. It was only on re-runs in the US, that like Secret Agent, it began to grow a large cult following. And as already mentioned it was during this time, where it would influence a lot of future American TV writers. It was because of the lack of popular approval, that McGoohan decided to leave Britain, first to Switzerland, before going onto America. The pressure of making The Prisoner, espescially towards the end of it's run, may also have taken it's toll on McGoohan, with many of his colleagues recalling times of noticeable stress onset.

 It was also at the time of making The Prisoner that he was cast in his biggest role up to this point. He appeared opposite Rock Hudson and Ernest Borgnine in the cold war adaptation of Alaister MacLean's Ice Station Zebra (1968). The film was reportedly watched 100 times, by America's reclusive mogul Howard Hughes. On set McGoohan also had a brush with death, as his foot became trapped in a flooded chamber, he had to be rescued by a diver.
 In the 70's McGoohan had a steay series of films roles, to keep himself occupied. Most notable were The Moonshine War (1970), The Silver Streak (1976) (below), one of Gene Wilder's and Richard Pryor's greatest collaborations and The Man in the Iron Mask (1977), in which he performed his own stunts.

                                               

 As well as these roles, he was also cast in popular US crime series Columbo, where he formed a lifelong friendship with star Peter Falk. He would appear in 4 episodes of the series from 1974-2000, as well as directing 6 of the episodes. His enigmatic demeanour providing the perfect foil to Falk's ever inquisitive detective.

     

  He won two Emmys for his guest appearances in Columbo, with Peter Falk, who described McGoohan as “the most underrated, under-appreciated talent on the face of the globe. I have never played a scene with another actor who commanded my attention the way Pat did.”

 Towards the end of the 70's that a keen interest of his series The Prisoner revived itself. A number of documentaries about the series began to be screened in America, Canada and the UK, as well as the show receiving further reruns on TV across the world. But talk of reviving the series itself was mooted by McGoohan himself.
 In 1979, he was cast opposite Clint Eastwood as the prison warden in Escape From Alcatraz. His character reflecting his own similar stern moralistic values, in what was another chilling performance, for which the world had now become accustomed to. The 1980's brought somewhat of a lull in Patrick's career, but he would still have notable roles, namely in David Cronenburg's Scanners, TV's Murder She Wrote and an award winning role on stage in Pack of Lies, which was to be his final theatrical role.
 The 90's saw him re-emerge in to more mainstream roles including The Phantom (1996), where he played Billy Zane's father and the southern judge in A Time to Kill (1996), based on the John Grisham bestseller.

                      

 But it was in the Academy Award winning blockbuster Braveheart (1995), directed by and starring Mel Gibson, in which McGoohan gave a new generation of audiences an appreciation of his work. As the cold and evil King Edward "Longshanks", he gave a stark and chilling portrayel opposite Gibson's hero William Wallace.
                                            

 His last role was in 2002's animated adventure Treasure Planet. But he was never able to escape the role that seemed to define him, The Prisoner. He was constantly sought by fans and media a like for further documentaries and talk of further episodes or a remake. A remake was eventually put into production and aired after McGoohan died in 2009. He was reportedly asked to be a part of it, but according to his widow "They wanted Patrick to have some part in it, but he adamantly didn't want to be involved. He had already done it." However, the remake's Number 2 Sir Ian Mckellen stated "He was asked to be in the first episode, there being a part that would have been very ironically fitting, but apparently he said that he didn't want to do it unless he was offered the part of Number Two."
 McGoohan himself did in fact reprise his role as Number 6 just one more time in 2000. In a Prisoner-themed episode of hit US comedy The Simpsons, he makes a brief cameo in helping Homer escape from "the Island". McGoohan was very popular with the writers of the show, and they were all pleased to finally get to meet him. He himself was reportedly very pleased with his role in the episode.

                                            

 Patrick McGoohan died on January 13th, 2009, leaving behind his wife of 58 years and his 3 children. As a post-script it should be remembered that not only was he responsible in part for reinventing the spy thriller with his character John Drake, but his revolutionary show The Prisoner has served to many, as a blue-print for a new type of science fiction thriller. It is with this where his legacy lies, with The Guardian once calling it "The Citizen Kane of British Television programmes". Though some may question why he never became an even bigger star, it wasn't through lack of offers. He has reportedly turned down three of the biggest film franchises in film history, not only as James Bond, but also as Gandalf in the Lord of the Rings (2001-2003) trilogy, as well as Professor Dumbledore from the Harry Potter series. His also had his own reservations to become a star, once saying: “I abhor the word 'star’. It makes the hair on the back of my neck want to curl up.” An intensly private man, he was never going to be an access all areas star like the celebrities of today. Like his hit show, he was certainly different and went against the mould of other stars. His unique enigmatic persona on screen has never been matched, and though he appeared quite limited in variety, he was always guaranteed to make an impression on the audience with his intensity.

Saturday 8 October 2011

My Favourite Film Quotes.

I can only put some of my favourite quotes, as my list would be endless otherwise:

"You don't understand! I coulda had class. I coulda been a contender. I could've been somebody, instead of a bum, which is what I am." (On The Waterfront, 1954)


"Get away from her, you bitch!" (Aliens, 1986)

"You've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya, punk?" (Dirty Harry, 1971)

"Today, I consider myself the luckiest man on the face of the earth." (Pride of the Yankees, 1942)


"As God is my witness, I'll never be hungry again." (Gone With The Wind, 1939)

"You are at your very best, when things are worst." (Starman, 1984)


"If you build it, he will come." (Field of Dreams, 1989)

"The last thing George said to me, 'Rock,' he said, 'sometime when the team is up against it and the breaks are beating the boys, tell them to go out there with all they've got and win just one for the Gipper." (Knute Rockne, All American, 1940)

"...We few, we happy few, we band of brothers..." (Henry V, 1944)

"Truly for some men nothing is written, unless they write it." (Lawrence of Arabia, 1961)

My Most Overrated Films of All Time

 I don't think any of these are particularly bad films, just overrated by the critics and fans:

8. The Wages of Fear (1953, H.G. Clouzot) 

 This is not a bad film by any means, in fact it's quite a good social realist piece. My problem with it though, is that it's lovers claim it is a great action film. For me an action film has to engage me with a certain level of excitment. Whilst I concede that the last half an hour is quite tense and suspenseful as the lorries carrying nitroglycerene negotiate the South American mountainous terrain, overall it is a relatively dull film.

7. Grave of the Fireflies (1988, I. Takahata) 
 Another overly sentimental piece now, and another film I just couldn't get emotionally attached to. I have no problem with Japanese animation either, having seen a number of Studio Ghibli features. Everyone says it's "Hautingly beautiful", but although I find it depressing, I sturggle to find any beauty in this. I may seem like a cold-hearted cynic, but it's overly-sentimental halfway to the point of loathsome.

6. Mystic River (2003, C. Eastwood)

 Being a huge fan of Clint Eastwood the actor, I do think he is venerated to the nth degree for his work as director. That's not to say he makes bad films, quite a few of them are very good. He has though made as many mediocre movies. Mystic River definetly falls into this category. Based on the synopsis of the film, I felt at the very least it would be compelling, but it ended up feeling all a bit contrived. Even the acting, which was rewarded with Oscar felt a bit overdone. Being such an overly charged emotional piece, it fell into melodrama too often and too easily.

5. His Girl Friday (1940, H. Hawks) 
 A revered classic now, that I just don't get. I would blame it on the quick talking fast paceness of the film, but I can't see how it is that much different in style to Cary Grant's screwball Bringing Up Baby (which I loved). I think it's because it was so revered when released, it was instantly hailed as a classic, but I think it's aged poorly. Another problem with it, is the ruthlessness of Grant's character, I find him hard to connect to and sterile. I accept that you don't have to connect with each character in movies, but I found it hard to find any interest in his and the film's story because of this.

4. Inglorious Basterds (2009, Q. Tarantino)
 Being a fan of Tarantino's and having read several good reviews, I was really expecting something substantial. I couldn't have been more wrong, I understand Tarantino's love for the unconventional, but here it just doesn't work. Whilst the style is wholly Tarantino's, I don't think it's enough to purely claim auteurism and expect the film to be good. Whilst the script does contain the usual Tarantino brand of humour, it lacks a bit of substance. I also think the screenplay lacks any real pinaché in the second half of the film.
 As with other Tarantino films , I respect the way he isn't afraid to speak his mind, and represents his characters as he best sees them. He doesn't make any attempt at being poltically correct, and for some reason he seems to get criticise for his honesty. That's why I like Tarantino, but with this, it at times seems a bit too gratuitous for my liking, whether that is his fault or in the delivery by the actors. Most of whom give solid performances (espescially Waltz), Brad Pitt however, gives one of his worst ever performances in this. I guess Brad thought being a Tarantino film, he could ham it up as much as possible (like Waltz did). What Brad forgot though, was to keep it in check and give some kind of variance on the role, of course this could be as much the writer's fault. For me it was just a bit too 'tongue in cheek', like most of the film. It just fell quite away short.

3. V for Vendetta (2006, J. McTeigue)
 Due to my right leaning political stance I would've thought a film about the bringing down of a leftist totalitatarian state would've had more appeal to me. I think it's a film that really profited from the time when it was realesed, where a lot of people were disillusioned with their respective governments and could connect with this film. I found it very similar to the film Brazil, but without the fun and flair. I'm willing to say that I may have been the problem with this film as I found it too deep and too preachy. That's not to say I have a problem with morally ambiguous characters in movie. Finally, I don't understand how people can like a film with such a amateur performance from Natalie Portman. She was awful in this.

2. The Departed (2006, M. Scorcese) 
 To think that Martin Scorcese directed Taxi Driver, Raging Bull and Gangs of New York, you would think the film he would eventually win Best Director for would be a collusus. Sadly it seemed to be awarded as a gesture from the Academy to this sub-standard crime thriller. It's not the convuluted plot that annoys me too much, nor the horrible editing errors (that I've come to expect from Scorcese), but more some of the questionable acting performance, particularly the over the top Jack Nicholson. He gives a performance that feels false and quite frankly ridiculous. Equally questionable is the bland Matt Damon, who seems at times a little out of his depth. I used to think Goodfellas was overrated, but I now regard that as a masterpiece in comparison to this substandard affair. Whilst I concede it does have some great moments, such as the performances of Di Caprio and Wahlberg and some clever plot devices, the eventual outcome is dragged out too much and over complicated, that I felt disoriented by the end of it.

1. Stand By Me (1986, R. Reiner)
 Dull, dull, dull. That's all I can say about this nostalgic piece based on the work of Stephen King. People claim that the child acting is a revelation, I think people are just being overly generous because they are child actors. Again they give solid performances, but this is what you would expect and want from a movie that centres predominantly around children. Possibly in the twenty years it was originally released it's aged really badly, and people haven't revisited it since. Or maybe people just think a lot of kids swearing and putting themselves in adult situation is very real and gritty. I just found it incredibly boring, the film didn't seem to go anywhere, which may have been the point, but even the "different" anti-climatic ending was uninteresting.